🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear the manager could survive a loss to Grimsby. He weathered a decisive European final against one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, undermining some of the club’s best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to engage. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' championship campaign, the coach took on the executive and appears to have missed. Even the most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who often railed at his players for losing individual battles crumbling in the face of the intense pressure and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted manager, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which United’s mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

A Tactical Clash Over System & Ideology

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, played a key role in trying to persuade him to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas faced pushback. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when issued by a man with the impeccable soccer background he possesses, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a championship team from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to outline his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause in place. The director speaks rarely publicly, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – men like him – simply operate on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, probably all we would hear is a series of ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being ready to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Power Behind Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his superior the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his desire for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to adopt data science and analytics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he announced that the team's approach to football “shall be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Who else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a modern arena that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

A New Football Order: Executives Over Coaches

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and drive to go into an organization and see their vision through to completion. But how many businesses have such individuals set up? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to invest the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the strategy by the directors and hire a coach who will adapt their offering accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more like delivery personnel: not really creating the food, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job has become less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the public face for a club they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into the Champions League and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined whereas the people who hired him continue to make errors another day.

The Modern Corporate Game: Accountability for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance in action: the rise of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose choices are always untouchable, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the system coach and then fire him for playing excessively 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and later discard them for requiring too long. And above all be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.