🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.